Appendix 1 Description Logic Terminology
نویسندگان
چکیده
The purpose of this appendix is to introduce (in a compact manner) the syntax and semantics of the most prominent DLs occurring in this handbook. More information and explanations as well as some less familiar DLs can be found in the respective chapters. For DL constructors whose semantics cannot be described in a compact manner, we will only introduce the syntax and refer the reader to the respective chapter for the semantics. Following Chapter 2 on Basic Description Logics, we will first introduce the basic DL AL, and then describe several of its extensions. Thereby, we will also fix the notation employed in this handbook. Finally, we will comment on the naming schemes for DLs that are employed in the literature and in this handbook. A1.1 Notational conventions Before starting with the definitions, let us introduce some notational conventions. The letters A,B will often be used for atomic concepts, and C, D for concept descriptions. For roles, we often use the letters R, S, and for functional roles (features, attributes) the letters f, g. Nonnegative integers (in number restrictions) are often denoted by n,m, and individuals by a, b. In all cases, we may also use subscripts. This convention is followed when defining syntax and semantics and in abstract examples. In concrete examples, the following conventions are used: concept names start with an uppercase letter followed by lowercase letters (e.g., Human, Male), role names (also functional ones) start with a lowercase letter (e.g., hasChild, marriedTo), and individual names are all uppercase (e.g., CHARLES, MARY).
منابع مشابه
Semantic Modularity and Module Extraction in Description Logics
The aim of this paper is to study semantic notions of modularity in description logic (DL) terminologies and reasoning problems that are relevant for modularity. We define two notions of a module whose independence is formalised in a model-theoretic way. Focusing mainly on the DLs EL and ALC, we then develop algorithms for module extraction, for checking whether a part of a terminology is a mod...
متن کاملDelivering Terminological Services
Terminologies or controlled vocabularies are important as they provide a framework within which communities can share knowledge. We describe three applications using a terminology represented in a Description Logic and delivered via a Terminology Server and suggest that such a service oriented architecture is essential to the adoption of terminologies within the component based architectures of...
متن کاملReport of the APA Task Force on Treatment of Gender Identity Disorder
Preface ........................................................................ Executive Summary and Recommendations Evaluation of Levels of Evidence .............................. Terminology .............................................................. Synopses of Literature Reviews and Opinions with Respect to Recommendations ................................. Why APA Recommendations Are N...
متن کاملOntological Modeling: Part 1
This is the first in a series of articles on ontology-based approaches to modeling. The main focus is on popular ontology languages proposed for the Semantic Web, such as the Resource Description Framework (RDF), RDF Schema (RDFS), and the Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL is based on description logic. A later series of articles will explore other logic-based languages such as Datalog. This fir...
متن کاملSyntax Proposal for Nominal Schemas
This paper proposes a syntax representation for nominal schemas, a new description-logic style extension of OWL 2 [2, 3]. Necessary and minimal modifications to Functional and Manchester grammars are included as well as mappings from these two syntaxes to Turtle. An appendix with two examples is added in order to clarify the proposal.
متن کامل